- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd like to know how by you said that in your original post you are having issues, then say he has yet to violate trust, then say he needs a phone because he walks. Too many contradictions and also a basic phone alleviates those "issues".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Life is not a single line that is followed. I didn't want to, nor do I need to, go in to all the personal details of what surrounds this tough time for him, nor should I have to. I see how "we're having trust issues" can easily be taken as a more severe situation as what really was happening, but then that shouldn't matter or have any influence on the question's intent or answer. Sure I could ignore the input that is a waste of time, suggesting he's sneaky and trying to deceive us, but he's not like that and will defend him to the end. I wasn't going to wait until the feces hits the rotary appliance before thinking I should look for advice and information. The issues aren't that he is doing anything wrong but maybe ... again, I don't need to explain and that's not necessarily contrdiction. He is/was having a hard time at school with some other kids. The other kid no longer goes to the school.
Bottom line is, I tried to foresee something possibly going the wrong way and wanted to ask if it was possible to do what I may need. Looks like I got that answer, but also much unsolicited information, assumptions, and criticism or questioning of my integrity? I don't need it, there's much more intertaining forums to frequent.
This one can be closed, I got my answer. Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Well then the original post and the backtracking were unnecessary. This is a public forum and as a result you will get comments on things you say.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »